We need to develop renewable sources of energy in order to cut carbon emissions. Wind should be a centerpiece of this development.
President Bush in 2006 said, “It’s possible we could generate 20 percent of our electricity needs with wind.”
What are we waiting for? All sorts of excuses are presented — costs, noise, place, nature disturbance. But, the issues are clean air and foreign oil. Wind is renewable, abundant, inexpensive (considering the costs of depleting sources of energy).
The U.S. National Academy of Sciences purports that wind generation on land can produce 40 times the current world consumption of electricity from all sources.
Wind could be heating, cooling and lighting buildings and running cars and trains. We are spending $500 billion annually subsidizing the use of fossil fuels compared to $46 billion on energy subsidies.
Oil fields run dry and coal runs out, but wind is there for the taking. Proper siting of wind farms is essential but doing with out is detrimental to our future and the health of our planet.
Vinita Burns
Wayne
Send questions/comments to the editors.
Success. Please wait for the page to reload. If the page does not reload within 5 seconds, please refresh the page.
Enter your email and password to access comments.
Hi, to comment on stories you must . This profile is in addition to your subscription and website login.
Already have a commenting profile? .
Invalid username/password.
Please check your email to confirm and complete your registration.
Only subscribers are eligible to post comments. Please subscribe or login first for digital access. Here’s why.
Use the form below to reset your password. When you've submitted your account email, we will send an email with a reset code.