FLORENCE, Italy — Few international criminal cases have stirred national passions as strongly as that of American student Amanda Knox, waiting half a world away for her third Italian court verdict in the 2007 slaying of her British roommate, Meredith Kercher, 21.
Whatever is decided this week, the protracted legal battle that has grabbed global headlines and polarized trial-watchers in three nations probably won’t end in Florence.
The first two trials produced flip-flop verdicts of guilty then not guilty for Knox and her former Italian boyfriend, Raffaele Sollecito, and the case has produced harshly clashing versions of events. A Florence appeals panel designated by Italy’s supreme court to address issues it raised about the acquittal is set to deliberate Thursday, with a verdict expected that day.
Much of the attention has focused on Knox, 26, who has remained in Seattle during this trial, studying at the University of Washington.
“We wait for the verdict, and remain hopeful,” Knox’s U.S. lawyer, Theodore Simon, said by telephone from Philadelphia.
Knox was arrested four days after Kercher’s half-naked body was discovered Nov. 2, 2007, in the Briton’s bedroom in the university town of Perugia. Knox has been portrayed both as a she-devil bent on sexual adventure and as a naif caught up in Italy’s Byzantine justice system.
U.S. commentators have accused the Italian judicial system of a case of misapplied justice and double jeopardy, while Italians and British observers have jumped on the image encoded in the U.S. defendant’s pre-trial moniker, ‘’foxy Knoxy.”
“I don’t remember any case which has been as highly publicized and where the countries have taken sides,” noted defense attorney Alan Dershowitz, who has written about the case.
“I think it’s fair to say that the vast number of Americans think she is innocent and a substantial number of Italians think she is guilty,” he said in a telephone interview.
The courts have cast wildly different versions of events. Knox and Sollecito were convicted of murder and sexual assault in the first trial based on DNA evidence, confused alibis and Knox’s false accusation against a Congolese bar owner, for which she was also convicted of slander.
Then an appeals court in Perugia dismantled the murder verdicts, criticizing the ‘’building blocks” of the conviction, including DNA evidence deemed unreliable by new experts, and lack of motive.
That acquittal was scathingly vacated last spring by Italy’s highest court, which ordered a new appeals trial to examine evidence and hear testimony it said had been improperly omitted by the Perugia appeals court, and to redress what it identified as lapses in logic.
In this trial, Judge Alessandro Nencini ordered an analysis of a tiny trace of DNA on the presumed murder weapon, a knife found in Sollecito’s kitchen. In the first trial, DNA traces on the blade linked to Kercher and one on the handle linked to Knox were key to the conviction. But the appeals court trial placed the DNA findings in doubt.
The new trace tested in Florence belonged to Knox and not to the victim. The defense argued that this was further proof that Knox had merely used the kitchen knife for domestic chores in Sollecito’s apartment. The prosecution, which has continued to argue the validity of Kercher’s DNA trace on the blade from the original trial, said the additional trace once again put the knife in Knox’s hands.
The real novelty of the Florence hearings was that the new prosecutor, Alessandro Crini, redefined the motive. He contended that the outburst of violence was rooted in arguments between Knox and Kercher about cleanliness and triggered by a toilet left unflushed by Rudy Hermann Guede, the only person now in jail for the murder.
A guilty verdict would need to be confirmed by Italy’s supreme court, which could take a year or more and in teory result in yet another appeals court trial.