Re-defining marriage is a lousy idea. Kudos go to M.D. Harmon’s commentary on page A6 of Saturday’s newspaper.
The column was based on facts and not agenda. It was a refreshing change to read a column where someone isn’t trying to influence the reader to think like they do.
Obviously, my wife and I will be voting no on Question 1. It is not out of hatred, but out of a sense of what is right.
As a Catholic, my parents sent me to Catholic school, I was in the children’s choir and I was an altar boy. I also attended CCD classes and made my confirmation while I was a freshman in high school. I was raised to believe marriage will always be one man and one woman. I am passing down those teachings to my four children.
Supporters of Question 1 will vote yes because it suits them.
I am voting no on Question 1 because it doesn’t suit me or my values.
Shane Gagne
Winslow
Send questions/comments to the editors.
Success. Please wait for the page to reload. If the page does not reload within 5 seconds, please refresh the page.
Enter your email and password to access comments.
Hi, to comment on stories you must . This profile is in addition to your subscription and website login.
Already have a commenting profile? .
Invalid username/password.
Please check your email to confirm and complete your registration.
Only subscribers are eligible to post comments. Please subscribe or login first for digital access. Here’s why.
Use the form below to reset your password. When you've submitted your account email, we will send an email with a reset code.