In his last year of public service to the people of Maine, an official portrait of Gov. John Baldacci was made at a cost to taxpayers of $20,000.

Was this a wise use of taxpayer money?

I love a good painting as much as anyone, but to spend that much taxpayer money to honor one man, and not think that was a bit silly would be, well … silly.

Would a cost-conscious man such as Gov. Paul LePage want us to pay $20,000 for a painting of himself in the future? He advocates cutting where we can because we are broke.

If I were governor, asking the people I serve to sacrifice so we all can prosper, I would first make myself the example and perhaps take a pay and benefit cuts. These actions would be more in line with what the people in Maine actually have to endure every day.

Perhaps a 20 percent cut and a 80/20 insurance plan would be a good start.


Over the last few years, I have noticed some very good paintings by wonderful artists around my local area. Perhaps one of these folks might donate a painting of LePage for free, knowing it would hang inside the State House for all to see.

If LePage doesn’t get re-elected, but Baldacci is elected for a second round at the Blaine House, would he have a second painting of himself done at another cost of $20,000 to the taxpayers of Maine? Would it hang on the State House wall beside himself? Wouldn’t that be silly?


Mark Joseph Pantermoller


Only subscribers are eligible to post comments. Please subscribe or login first for digital access. Here’s why.

Use the form below to reset your password. When you've submitted your account email, we will send an email with a reset code.