What if we reduce pollution and it’s all for nothing?

I don’t understand why you subject your readers to M.D. Harmon’s hare-brained opinions every Saturday.

His rambling climate-change-denial column this week (Feb. 22, “Statistics about global warming not in dispute, just interpretation”) reminded me about a cartoon in which someone stands up at a conference about reducing greenhouse gases, and says, “But what if it’s all a big hoax, and we end up reducing air pollution, water pollution, oil dependency and urban congestion for nothing?”

Claire ProntnickiWaterville

Share

Related Stories