What if we reduce pollution and it’s all for nothing?

I don’t understand why you subject your readers to M.D. Harmon’s hare-brained opinions every Saturday.

His rambling climate-change-denial column this week (Feb. 22, “Statistics about global warming not in dispute, just interpretation”) reminded me about a cartoon in which someone stands up at a conference about reducing greenhouse gases, and says, “But what if it’s all a big hoax, and we end up reducing air pollution, water pollution, oil dependency and urban congestion for nothing?”

Claire ProntnickiWaterville

Invalid username/password.

Success. Please wait for the page to reload. If the page does not reload within 5 seconds, please refresh the page.

Enter your email and password to access comments.

Hi {SUB NAME}, to comment on stories you must . This profile is in addition to your subscription and website login.
Already have one? .

Invalid username/password.

Please check your email to confirm and complete your registration.