Ten months ago, an FBI special agent shot and killed Ibragim Todashev in the course of interrogating him about a Massachusetts triple murder possibly linked to the late Tamerlan Tsarnaev, the suspected mastermind of the April 15 Boston Marathon bombings. Last week, the Justice Department and state authorities in Florida, where the shooting occurred, produced the first detailed official accounts of this bizarre incident. Those long-awaited documents helped settle some key questions while leaving other mysteries unsolved.

Most important, both an internal Justice Department investigation and the parallel probe by a Florida state’s attorney show convincingly that the still-unnamed agent committed no crime or other intentional wrongdoing. He fired on Todashev only after the mixed-martial-arts expert threw a coffee table at the agent’s head, opening a large gash, and then rushed with a metal pole at both the agent and his colleague from the Massachusetts State Police. Investigators relied not only on the testimony of the officers involved but also on independent, corroborating statements from other people and on physical evidence. The fact that state’s attorney confirmed the self-defense scenario lends it credibility. The FBI could benefit from independent input in future investigations of lethal force by its agents, as it has historically exonerated them in almost every case.

What remains unclear is the precise nature and extent of Todashev’s admissions about the triple homicide in Waltham, Mass., on Sept. 11, 2011 — and what, specifically, he revealed about Tsarnaev’s role. That horrific crime has gone unsolved for too long.

Also, the fact that the FBI agent did not act criminally does not mean that he and his colleagues from Massachusetts law enforcement acted wisely or appropriately at every turn of this highly sensitive investigation. Among the questions the bureau should be exploring is why the agent needed to fire a second volley of three shots after a first one had wounded Todashev. And why was it considered unavoidable to risk a meeting with Todashev in his apartment, where improvised weapons were within his reach, rather than some alternative location?

Yes, it’s easy to second-guess, but the only way to redeem this tragic incident is to learn every lesson from it that can possibly be learned.

Only subscribers are eligible to post comments. Please subscribe or login first for digital access. Here’s why.

Use the form below to reset your password. When you've submitted your account email, we will send an email with a reset code.