GORHAM — Lauren Leidemann-Smith singled home the go-ahead run in the fourth inning and finished 3 for 4 with three RBI, and the University of Southern Maine advanced to the championship round of the Little East Conference softball tournament with a 10-8 win Thursday against UMass Dartmouth.
The top-seeded Huskies (31-2-1) overcame a 6-2 deficit to win their three-team pod and set up a best-of-three series Saturday in Gorham against No. 2 Eastern Connecticut State (28-2).
UMass Dartmouth (10-14-1) took the lead by scoring four runs in the top of the third, but USM quickly answered with four runs in the bottom half to make it 6-6.
The Huskies then went ahead for good in the fourth on RBI singles by Leidemann-Smith and Madison Day. Leidemann-Smith added a two-run single in the fifth, extending the lead to 10-6.
Day and Samantha Hauck each finished with two RBI, and Kaitlyn Nelson went 3 for 4 with three runs scored.
Lauren Merrill got the win in relief of Kirsten Pelletier, allowing two unearned runs in 4 2/3 innings.
USM 2, RHODE ISLAND COLLEGE 1: Ben Lambert pitched a five-hitter and escaped a ninth-inning jam as the second-seeded Huskies (28-8) won their opening pod game in the Little East Conference tournament, in Gorham.
USM got its only runs in the second inning. Andrew Olszak led off with a single, stole second and scored on Janek Luksza’s double. Luksza advanced to third on a groundout and raced home on Jason Komulainen’s two-out bunt single.
Lambert took a shutout into the ninth, but an error, a walk and an RBI single by Cal Parrillo cut the deficit to 2-1. A passed ball put runners on second and third with one out, but Lambert got a pop-up and a groundout to end the game.
The Huskies will host either Rhode Island College (22-10) or Castleton (9-22) in the pod final on Saturday, with an if-necessary game scheduled for Monday if USM loses Saturday. The pod winner advances to the best-of-three championship series, starting next Thursday.
Comments are not available on this story. Read more about why we allow commenting on some stories and not on others.
We believe it's important to offer commenting on certain stories as a benefit to our readers. At its best, our comments sections can be a productive platform for readers to engage with our journalism, offer thoughts on coverage and issues, and drive conversation in a respectful, solutions-based way. It's a form of open discourse that can be useful to our community, public officials, journalists and others.
We do not enable comments on everything — exceptions include most crime stories, and coverage involving personal tragedy or sensitive issues that invite personal attacks instead of thoughtful discussion.
You can read more here about our commenting policy and terms of use. More information is also found on our FAQs.
Show less