AUGUSTA — A jury cleared a city man of the two most serious offenses he faced but convicted him of two others in a verdict returned Wednesday night at the Capital Judicial Center.
Arthur J. Jones, 58, of Augusta, was found not guilty of gross sexual assault and aggravated assault. He was found guilty of unlawful sexual conduct and assault, which occurred Dec. 22, 2016, in Augusta.
“Arthur is a good hardworking man who fell into an unfortunate relationship,” said Stephen C. Smith, Jones’ defense attorney, via email Thursday. “I am very pleased that the jury found him not guilty of the very serious gross sexual assault and aggravated assault accusations. This was a difficult case for the jury and they worked very hard sorting it out. We will appeal the remaining counts.”
District Attorney Maeghan Maloney, whose office prosecuted Jones, said, “I appreciate the jury’s time and attention and the felony sex conviction of Mr. Jones. Like all sex assault cases, the jury had to decide whom to believe, and the victim is thankful for their trust in her. Because Mr. Jones failed to register as a sex offender on a prior rape conviction out of state, he also will be prosecuted federally.”
According to the indictment, Jones was convicted of rape on June 22, 1992, in Plymouth County, Massachusetts.
“As required by the rules of evidence, the jury was not informed of the prior out-of-state rape conviction,” Maloney noted in her email.
Jones, who has been held in jail in lieu of bail since his arrest on Dec. 23, 2016, will be sentenced later, according to a note in the court file by Justice Robert Muller, who presided at the two-day trial. Jurors deliberated about five hours before returning their verdict.
Jones testified in his own defense, saying he and the victim had been boyfriend and girlfriend and dating for several months. He also said that he had returned home several times to find her in his apartment.
Betty Adams — 621-5631
Twitter: @betadams
Comments are not available on this story. Read more about why we allow commenting on some stories and not on others.
We believe it's important to offer commenting on certain stories as a benefit to our readers. At its best, our comments sections can be a productive platform for readers to engage with our journalism, offer thoughts on coverage and issues, and drive conversation in a respectful, solutions-based way. It's a form of open discourse that can be useful to our community, public officials, journalists and others.
We do not enable comments on everything — exceptions include most crime stories, and coverage involving personal tragedy or sensitive issues that invite personal attacks instead of thoughtful discussion.
You can read more here about our commenting policy and terms of use. More information is also found on our FAQs.
Show less