President Donald Trump calling Democrats “socialists” is as silly and as inaccurate as calling Trump and Republicans capitalists. Yet that has become an important part of Trump’s re-election strategy. This type of political propaganda is another of his diversionary tactics to take voters’ focus away from his embarrassing performance as president.
Capitalism is based on a free market to determine prices and to distribute wealth. The means of production and business are privately owned. Socialism is based on state ownership of businesses and central planning of the economy by the government to make society more equitable.
The U.S. economy has been a fusion of capitalism and socialism at least since the Gilded Age and the time of the robber barons in the late 1800s. The U.S., like other countries with the highest standards of living and quality of life, combines elements of capitalism and socialism. Others include Canada, Australia, the United Kingdom, Japan, Ireland, Germany, Denmark, Norway, the Netherlands and France.
Examples of elements of socialism found in the U.S. economy and government include Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, unemployment insurance, FDIC savings insurance, VA hospitals, public education, trade unions, farm and fishermen cooperatives, public libraries, public highways, public drinking water, and so on. Other elements include the many trade tariffs and government subsidies of American industry and business, from oil to agriculture.
Not surprisingly, Trump’s campaign rhetoric conflicts with his actions. He is a big advocate of trade tariffs and business subsidies. The construction of Trump’s U.S. luxury resorts and hotels were made possible by large government tax cuts and other subsidies. Such corporate welfare from which he has benefited personally is not part of a capitalist, free market economy.
Don’t fall for Trump’s latest political con game. If looking for a capitalist presidential candidate, consider the Libertarian Party.
George Seel
Belgrade
Comments are not available on this story. Read more about why we allow commenting on some stories and not on others.
We believe it's important to offer commenting on certain stories as a benefit to our readers. At its best, our comments sections can be a productive platform for readers to engage with our journalism, offer thoughts on coverage and issues, and drive conversation in a respectful, solutions-based way. It's a form of open discourse that can be useful to our community, public officials, journalists and others.
We do not enable comments on everything — exceptions include most crime stories, and coverage involving personal tragedy or sensitive issues that invite personal attacks instead of thoughtful discussion.
You can read more here about our commenting policy and terms of use. More information is also found on our FAQs.
Show less