According to a Dec. 3 article, Sen. Susan Collins is co-sponsoring a bill to “bolster local recycling rates across the country.” It would include activities “ranging from public service announcements to labeling signs for recycling bins,” and help “preserve our nation’s stunning beauty.”
The senator’s sentiment is touching, but raising the recycling rate a few percentage points through better labeling and public service announcements is a grossly inadequate response to our waste management problems and signals, once again, the she doesn’t comprehend the magnitude of the environmental crisis confronting the planet.
At the present time even environmentalists are being undercut by a system that can not provide markets for recycled materials now that China and other countries are refusing to be a dumping ground for our waste products. Yes, we need better recycling, but on a scale that dwarfs our feeble efforts thus far, and the remedy that the senator is proposing.
It has been estimated that the production, consumption, and disposal of goods and food accounts for 42 percent of the greenhouse gas emissions in the United States. Though It is difficult to tease out the disposal component of this total, clearly we need a massive overhaul of the way products are sold, packaged, transported, and recycled if we are to substantially reduce plastics in the environment, and the overall impact of waste disposal on global warming.
Unfortunately, the senator’s proposal is more suited to 1980 than 2020.
Joe Hardy
Wells
Comments are not available on this story. Read more about why we allow commenting on some stories and not on others.
We believe it's important to offer commenting on certain stories as a benefit to our readers. At its best, our comments sections can be a productive platform for readers to engage with our journalism, offer thoughts on coverage and issues, and drive conversation in a respectful, solutions-based way. It's a form of open discourse that can be useful to our community, public officials, journalists and others.
We do not enable comments on everything — exceptions include most crime stories, and coverage involving personal tragedy or sensitive issues that invite personal attacks instead of thoughtful discussion.
You can read more here about our commenting policy and terms of use. More information is also found on our FAQs.
Show less