BOSTON — Most fully vaccinated people in Massachusetts should no longer feel required to wear a mask against COVID-19 in most indoor spaces, according to updated recommendations released Tuesday by the state Department of Public Health.
There are some exceptions.
People who are fully vaccinated should continue to wear masks indoors if they have a weakened immune system, are at increased risk for severe disease because of their age or an underlying medical condition, or if someone in their household has a weakened immune system and is at increased risk for severe disease or is unvaccinated.
The recommendations do not apply to a person’s home, where masks have generally not been recommended during the pandemic.
People who are not fully vaccinated should continue to wear a face covering or mask when indoors with others to help prevent spreading COVID-19.
Many local cities and towns — including Boston — continue to require the use of masks in indoor public settings.
Health officials cited the wide acceptance of vaccines and recent improvements in COVID-19 indicators in Massachusetts for the updated recommendations.
People who have tested positive or are a close contact of someone with COVID-19 should continue to follow isolation and quarantine guidance, including wearing a mask in public for five more days after leaving isolation or quarantine, regardless of vaccination status.
All people in Massachusetts, regardless of vaccination status, are required to continue wearing face coverings in certain settings, including on public transportation and in health care facilities.
The state has posted a complete list of venues where face coverings have remained mandatory since May 29, 2021.
The new mask guidance is the latest easing of coronavirus recommendations as the highly contagious omicron variant continues to wane.
Last week, Gov. Charlie Baker announced that students and staff at Massachusetts public schools won’t have to wear face coverings indoors starting Feb. 28.
Comments are not available on this story. Read more about why we allow commenting on some stories and not on others.
We believe it's important to offer commenting on certain stories as a benefit to our readers. At its best, our comments sections can be a productive platform for readers to engage with our journalism, offer thoughts on coverage and issues, and drive conversation in a respectful, solutions-based way. It's a form of open discourse that can be useful to our community, public officials, journalists and others.
We do not enable comments on everything — exceptions include most crime stories, and coverage involving personal tragedy or sensitive issues that invite personal attacks instead of thoughtful discussion.
You can read more here about our commenting policy and terms of use. More information is also found on our FAQs.
Show less