Watershed residents and business owners on and around North Pond from the towns of Rome, Mercer and Smithfield are invited to attend a public meeting to learn more about the preliminary results of a two-year study to determine why North Pond has been turning green every summer since 2018, and what actions are needed to restore water quality.
The meeting has been moved from the Rome location to the Smithfield Town Office at 926 Village Road in Smithfield. It will be held from 6:30-8:30 p.m. Monday, July 24. The meeting will be accessible through Zoom as well for anyone unable to attend in person. Zoom link is https://www.northpondmaine.org/
The meeting will include a panel of scientists and watershed managers that have been collaborating on the project since early 2022 including Dr. Danielle Wain and Charlie Baeder from 7 Lakes Alliance, Jennifer Jespersen from Ecological Instincts, and Dr. Ken Wagner of Water Resource Services, according to a news release from Jespersen.
There will be 30 minutes set aside at the end of the meeting for attendees to ask questions about the recommendations and to provide input on the 10-year Watershed-Based Management Plan that will be released later this year. Recommendations will focus on actions that can be taken to reduce the amount of phosphorus in the lake in order to prevent algal blooms from returning. Management considerations will focus on addressing runoff from watershed sources such as roads, driveways, and camps as well as addressing phosphorus in the lake sediments.
The North Pond Watershed-Based Management Plan project is funded in-part by the US Environmental Protection Agency under the Clean Water Act. Project partners include the Kennebec County SWCD, North Pond Association, 7 Lakes Alliance, Colby College, Towns of Smithfield, Rome, and Mercer, KVCOG, Somerset County SWCD, USDA/Natural Resources Conservation Service, Maine DEP, Ecological Instincts, and Water Resource Services.
For more information visit northpondmaine.org.
Comments are not available on this story. Read more about why we allow commenting on some stories and not on others.
We believe it's important to offer commenting on certain stories as a benefit to our readers. At its best, our comments sections can be a productive platform for readers to engage with our journalism, offer thoughts on coverage and issues, and drive conversation in a respectful, solutions-based way. It's a form of open discourse that can be useful to our community, public officials, journalists and others.
We do not enable comments on everything — exceptions include most crime stories, and coverage involving personal tragedy or sensitive issues that invite personal attacks instead of thoughtful discussion.
You can read more here about our commenting policy and terms of use. More information is also found on our FAQs.
Show less