I wish to respond to the Nov. 28 op-ed by Jeffrey Evangelos (“Graham Platner has a Blackwater problem”). I suggest Mr. Evangelos read the Dec. 5 article in Politico magazine by Michael Kruse. It’s an in-depth look at Platner, and shows him to be extremely intelligent, thoughtful and not easy to decipher. 

Platner did not run off to work for Blackwater “as a mercenary” exactly. He worked for a subsidiary, as a security guard for an ambassador. He needed money, missed the camaraderie of military life and was feeling adrift. Eventually, black-out drinking, PTSD and seeing the absurdity of war — while at the same time having an affection for combat — landed him in long-term therapy at the VA. So much about Platner is hard to square. 

A teacher’s college reference letter reads: “What can you say about a kid whose hero is Winston Churchill? Who devours history books for pleasure? Who is demanding that I read Kipling’s ‘The Man Who Would Be King?'” (a book about power and imperialism). 

I’m excited about someone who is complex, of high intelligence, honest, open, personable and who can see the problems that need fixing with clarity. Visit Platner’s website to get familiar with his policy ideas and vision. It’s a strong list. 

I’ll end by saying it’s still early in the game, and there are two other fine candidates on the Dems side. Right now, Platner has our vote.

Lorry Fleming
Bath