Sen. Collins’ proposal to inject $20 million for body cams and $2 million for de-escalation training into Department of Homeland Security funding misses the core problem with ICE.
The chaos and escalation to violence that many ICE agents are sowing illustrates their disregard for regulations as well as their lack of training. Studies show mixed results for body cams reducing excessive force, and enforcing their use is challenging. Their ability to “protect ICE and the general public,” per Sen. Collins, is still unproven.
Why add funds for extra de-escalation training when de-escalation is a cornerstone of law enforcement training already? Safety training is serious business and $2 million is a paltry sum for the multiplying numbers of ICE recruits. This shows a lack of understanding of the necessity for comprehensive training at the outset.
The root problem is that the immigration enforcement plan under Donald Trump, Kristi Noem, Stephen Miller and others is simply cruel politics. Unchecked intimidation and chaos is their goal, not making our country safe from criminals. More money for body cams and insufficient amounts of additional training cannot correct the problems with ICE. Misguided intentions, hasty recruiting, incomplete vetting and training, followed by rushed onboarding make ICE a program unworthy of continued funding.
Elizabeth Moberg
South Portland
Comments are not available on this story. Read more about why we allow commenting on some stories and not on others.
We believe it's important to offer commenting on certain stories as a benefit to our readers. At its best, our comments sections can be a productive platform for readers to engage with our journalism, offer thoughts on coverage and issues, and drive conversation in a respectful, solutions-based way. It's a form of open discourse that can be useful to our community, public officials, journalists and others.
We do not enable comments on everything — exceptions include most crime stories, and coverage involving personal tragedy or sensitive issues that invite personal attacks instead of thoughtful discussion.
You can read more here about our commenting policy and terms of use. More information is also found on our FAQs.
Show less