TRENTON, N.J. — A man convicted twice in a notorious 1990s rape and murder in New Jersey has lost his bid for a new trial based on bite-mark evidence.
Steven Fortin was convicted in the 1994 attack along Route 1 in Avenel, which was featured on the cable TV series “Forensic Files.”
The former Brewer, Maine, man also pleaded guilty to an attack on a Maine state trooper several months later that officials said exhibited similar characteristics to the New Jersey attack.
Fortin was serving a 20-year sentence in a Maine prison when the New Jersey charges were brought against him.
Fortin’s first conviction in New Jersey was overturned due to evidentiary issues surrounding testimony by an expert witness who spoke about similarities between the two attacks.
Fortin was on death row before New Jersey abolished the death penalty in 2007 and his sentence was changed to life without parole.
In his appeal, he argued that studies in recent years have cast doubt on the reliability of bite-mark evidence and led to the reversal of more than two dozen convictions.
In Tuesday’s appellate ruling, the three-judge panel said jurors at Fortin’s second trial heard testimony about the unreliability of bite-mark evidence, and noted that no state has ruled it is inadmissible in criminal trials.
DNA evidence also tied Fortin to the scene of the New Jersey attack and helped to convict him, the panel said.
Comments are not available on this story. Read more about why we allow commenting on some stories and not on others.
We believe it's important to offer commenting on certain stories as a benefit to our readers. At its best, our comments sections can be a productive platform for readers to engage with our journalism, offer thoughts on coverage and issues, and drive conversation in a respectful, solutions-based way. It's a form of open discourse that can be useful to our community, public officials, journalists and others.
We do not enable comments on everything — exceptions include most crime stories, and coverage involving personal tragedy or sensitive issues that invite personal attacks instead of thoughtful discussion.
You can read more here about our commenting policy and terms of use. More information is also found on our FAQs.
Show less