The Sept. 28 op-ed on how Maine’s property taxes are choking residents was timely (“Maine is choking its future. It’s time to loosen the grip.”). National political developments suggest that the move to pass more responsibilities onto the states, while not equitably passing on the funding for these responsibilities, will only make local problems worse.

I am a Maine native and a longtime resident of Germany and thus have had a different tax experience. In Europe, consumption is taxed higher and investment lower — therefore property taxes are insignificant for most people. This encourages economic growth behaviors. As people age, their income and consumption generally decline and, as such, so do their taxes. You can age in place easier.

I have experienced my property taxes in Maine accelerate much faster than wage or inflation increases. Unfortunately, too much of the op-ed was focused on who should pay the current liabilities and not enough was focused on community costs and revenues.

Perhaps Maine should increase consumption taxes and tax revenue — especially given our role as “Vacationland” — which would mean bigger visitor contributions to community expenses. How about promoting (not demoting) vacation or second homes, since these properties have the best income/cost relationship for towns — very little related costs (no schools, less traffic/trash/sewage, more income for local maintenance businesses)?

As it stands, school costs are simply out of control. When K-12 enrollment is down and education outcomes have declined significantly, justifying well above inflation annual increases needs serious action — not just more attention. I would also suggest that “indirect” non-classroom expenses — after-school-related activities — must be significantly reduced.

Jeff Gardner
Cumberland