I am extremely upset that you would block me from reading one of my favorite parts of your paper. Doonesbury/Gary Trudeau’s opinionated cartoons are necessary to our culture.
Thomas Nast was a social commentator who also used the comic strip venue. Would you want to go down in history as banning his views of then-unpopular commentary. We now accept many of Nast’s views as Americana.
The controversy attached to women’s rights vs. religious dogma can be highly explosive on both sides. I would think that your duty as a deliverer of the news, however, would not be to ban one side’s arguments while printing full explanations of Newt Gingrich’s statements.
Give us the information, no matter what format, and let us, the readers, decide which side to take.
Andy Carbone
North Anson
Copy the Story LinkSend questions/comments to the editors.
Success. Please wait for the page to reload. If the page does not reload within 5 seconds, please refresh the page.
Enter your email and password to access comments.
Hi, to comment on stories you must . This profile is in addition to your subscription and website login.
Already have a commenting profile? .
Invalid username/password.
Please check your email to confirm and complete your registration.
Only subscribers are eligible to post comments. Please subscribe or login first for digital access. Here’s why.
Use the form below to reset your password. When you've submitted your account email, we will send an email with a reset code.