AUGUSTA — John Peters wanted to know which of his employees might bring a gun to work. So did other employees at Down East Energy, some of whom remembered the fatal shooting of their co-worker, 38-year-old Cynthia Nelson, outside the company’s Gorham office in 1996.

In July 2011, Peters, then president of Brunswick-based Down East Energy, asked the company’s safety coordinator to file a public records request with the Maine State Police seeking the names of concealed-weapon permit holders.

The company’s Freedom of Access Act request for concealed-weapon data is among 10 that have been submitted to state police by several organizations since 2005, according to records obtained by the Portland Press Herald. That could add to the debate about whether concealed-weapon data should be made confidential after 32 years in the public domain.

For Peters, the records request was about workplace safety and peace of mind.

“I wasn’t the only one who wanted to know who was bringing a gun to work,” he said Thursday. “A lot of the people who work here wanted to know, too.”

Gun-rights activists say concerns about safety and privacy are reason enough to make the data in concealed-weapon permits private. So far, they’re winning the argument with state lawmakers.

Advertisement

Last week, the Legislature invoked a constitutional emergency to shield such data temporarily. Another debate looms on a proposal to make it private permanently.

The controversial measure was a response to a quickly aborted request for concealed-weapon data by a Bangor newspaper and another by an unidentified party. The request by the Bangor Daily News outraged gun-rights activists, who worried that the paper would publish the information.

Peters had other concerns when he told Down East Energy’s safety coordinator, Mark Anderson, to request concealed-weapon data from the state police in 2011.

The company’s request came 21 days after Gov. Paul LePage signed into law a bill allowing permit holders to leave their handguns in their vehicles during work hours, even if private employers had policies prohibiting employees from bringing weapons onto company property.

The Maine State Chamber of Commerce opposed the bill.

Down East Energy banned weapons from company property after Nelson, an office worker, died from shotgun wounds inflicted by her former boyfriend, 31-year-old Scott Bunting.

Advertisement

According to news accounts, Nelson died while being taken to Maine Medical Center in Portland. Bunting, who was not a Down East employee, died outside the office after shooting himself in the throat.

Peters arrived at his Gorham office shortly after the shooting. Bunting’s body was still in the parking lot.

“It was one of the worst days of my life,” Peters said Thursday.

He told the same story to the Legislature’s Criminal Justice Committee in 2012, in testimony against a proposal that expanded the gun law to cover public workplaces, such as prisons, state offices and state parks.

Peters and the Maine State Chamber of Commerce hoped to persuade lawmakers to repeal the 2011 bill. They weren’t successful.

The 2011 bill rendered moot Down East Energy’s policy banning deadly weapons on company grounds.

Advertisement

Peters said that if the company couldn’t keep concealed-weapon permit holders from bringing their guns to work, it should at least know which employees might do so.

“As the legislation moved through, I decided, ‘Well, if we’re going to lose this battle, at the very least I’d like to know who amongst our employees has a concealed-weapons permit,” Peters said.

Peters is now vice president with Osterman Propane LLC, a subsidiary of NGL Energy Partners LP, the Oklahoma-based company that bought Down East Energy in April. He said Thursday that he will soon leave the company after more than 30 years.

He emphasized that he couldn’t speak on behalf of the new owners, only the former ones, the Morrells, the Brunswick family that owned operated Down East Energy for more than 80 years.

Down East’s records request didn’t yield any information because the state police dosn’t have a central database of concealed-weapon permit holders.

Peters requested permit information from local police departments but gave up when he realized that his workers lived in many towns.

Advertisement

Nonetheless, he still thinks the information should be public.

“Personally speaking, I’ve tried to understand the claim … that publishing such information will only give bad guys the ability to know which good guys have guns,” Peters said. “I’m sorry, but I don’t buy it.”

Peters said he plans to testify against Republican Rep. Corey Wilson’s bill to make concealed-weapon data private permanently. It’s unclear whether other business owners will join him.

Peter Gore, the lobbyist for the Maine State Chamber of Commerce, said his organization hasn’t taken a position on the bill and probably won’t.

The chamber will support a bill sponsored by Sen. Stan Gerzofsky, D-Brunswick, that would repeal the 2011 law allowing concealed-weapon permit holders to leave guns in their vehicles at work, regardless of company policy.

“It was never a gun issue for us. It was a private property issue,” Gore said Thursday. “We would have made the same argument if employers wanted to make sure their employees didn’t leave swords in their vehicles. Employers want to choose what takes place on their private property, and employers lost that choice (in 2011).”

Advertisement

Asked whether employers have a right to know whether their employees hold concealed-weapon permits, Gore said, “That’s not for me to say. That’s up to the Legislature.”

Peters said his support for Gerzofsky’s bill and opposition to Wilson’s bill doesn’t reflect a stance on guns.

“Our effort has nothing to do with your right to carry a concealed weapon,” he said. “It has everything to do with our right to determine what happens on our property.”

Wilson’s bill will be heard by the Judiciary Committee on March 12. The Criminal Justice Committee has not scheduled a hearing on Gerzofsky’s bill.

Steve Mistler — 620-7016

smistler@pressherald.com


Only subscribers are eligible to post comments. Please subscribe or login first for digital access. Here’s why.

Use the form below to reset your password. When you've submitted your account email, we will send an email with a reset code.