The people’s right to know is an essential ingredient in a democracy. If people don’t know what their government is up to, they cannot make informed judgments in the voting booth.

Unfortunately, that is a position that is more popular on the campaign trail than it is among office holders.

As a candidate, President Barack Obama promised the most transparent administration in history, but when it comes to one of his most controversial initiatives — the use of remote-controlled drones to hunt and kill individual enemies — the administration has been opaque.

The office of Legal Council has produced memos for the White House outlining the legal justification and procedure for killing perceived enemies, including American citizens, off the battlefield. The American people need to know what that policy is and what its limits are so they can participate fully in this democracy.

Unfortunately, governments can always find reasons not to reveal what they are up to. Sometimes they are legitimate. Sometimes it’s just a matter of convenience. Sometimes it is to hide wrongdoing.

We still have not seen the Senate Intelligence Committee’s report about the use of torture during the Bush administration. Senators have seen the report and commented about it, but the public is not in any position to evaluate whether the program could be judged as effective.


Instead, people are ruled by their gut feelings and poorly documented folklore about what went on or why.

There are costs to transparency, but there are even greater costs to keeping secrets. Some people think that arrest records should protected, and people who have not yet been convicted of a crime should not be identified.

It is unlikely, however, that anyone who feels that way has ever lived in a country where secret arrests are common. The price of individual embarrassment buys an extremely valuable check on government power.

The Maine Legislature this year is considering several bills that are proposed to protect individual privacy. Lawmakers, however, should tread very carefully before making any changes that obscure government actions.

Backers of a bill to hide the names of concealed-carry permit holders have claimed that it is a protection of the right to own guns, but it is really a bill that would give government unchecked authority to decide who can carry one.

This is not how democracies are supposed to work. Lawmakers on the state or federal level should not erode these important protections.

Only subscribers are eligible to post comments. Please subscribe or login first for digital access. Here’s why.

Use the form below to reset your password. When you've submitted your account email, we will send an email with a reset code.