The visit of a sitting governor to his disaster-stricken hometown would seem to be the perfect time for him to connect with constituents in crisis.

Three major fires in the last 10 days have destroyed 79 apartments in downtown Lewiston, leaving nearly 200 people without a place to live. The city is on alert, and a few words of reassurance from Maine’s top elected official would have helped residents feel that they’re not alone.

Gov. Paul LePage, however, didn’t offer city residents much sympathy during a brief tour of the damage on Tuesday morning. Indeed, he didn’t offer them much of anything.

At a news conference, the governor said he had no discretionary funds to direct toward the resettlement process. He also expressed doubt that state agencies could provide much help.

When asked what it felt like to be back in his hometown, LePage said, “It brings back bad memories.”

Essentially, he told Lewiston residents that they shouldn’t count on state government to carry out a bedrock government responsibility: helping people who are in a dire situation through no fault of their own.


Later in the day, the governor’s spokeswoman delivered the same message in different words. LePage does have $200,000 in a contingency account, she said, but he won’t be tapping it to help Lewiston.

The governor has often talked about his unhappy childhood in Lewiston. That’s beside the point, though, at a time like this. Thousands of other people still make their lives in this city, and it’s hard to imagine their taking comfort from LePage’s implication that it’s not a desirable place to live.

The governor also apparently lacks insight into the state’s role in situations like this one. State fire investigators are assisting the Lewiston Police investigation; the Maine State Housing Authority, Maine Emergency Management Agency and Department of Health and Human Services are helping coordinate social services for fire victims.

Overseeing disaster response and recovery is part of the government’s job description. It makes sense for local officials to take the lead, since they’re the most aware of victims’ needs, but state agencies have critical resources, such as the documentation that displaced residents need to obtain services. It’s not out of line to expect the state to step up during a crisis, even though LePage is acting as if it is.

The state can help prevent as well as respond to disasters. State aid to municipalities helps fund local services such as public safety and building inspection.

In communities with aging housing stock such as Lewiston, it’s not hard to project that the revenue-sharing cuts in LePage’s budget proposal could lead to fewer inspections and lower the chance of detecting that a structure is at risk of catching fire.

LePage has often expressed the view that state government is too big and has taken on tasks that are outside its scope. With his remarks in Lewiston, however, he has taken this point of view to its extreme.

The city will suffer if LePage’s wish for the state to abdicate its core responsibilities results in the curtailment of the recovery and rebuilding assistance Lewiston needs and deserves.

Only subscribers are eligible to post comments. Please subscribe or login first for digital access. Here’s why.

Use the form below to reset your password. When you've submitted your account email, we will send an email with a reset code.