In a classic example for “d—d if you do, d—d if you don’t,” this week a lawyer argued that his client’s sentence of a year in the brig and a bad conduct discharge for rape and adultery was too harsh, and was the result of the improper influence of the commandant. This influence consisting of a set of speeches telling the Corps that it was intolerable to treat rape and other sexual impropriety as something to brush under the rug.
This comes after a multiyear campaign in the public sector and Congress to push the military commanders to crack down on sex offenders.
If the court swallows this Twinkie defense, it will kill reform.
Tom HeynsChelsea
Send questions/comments to the editors.
Related Stories
Latest Articles
-
On Music Lucky ClarkTrevor Lewington of Enter The Haggis talks about new album, upcoming Waterville show
-
Editorials
Our View: New Sea Dogs coach sends ‘powerful’ message
-
Opinion
Today’s editorial cartoon
-
Columnists
David Trahan: Impact on sportsmen just a small piece of ‘forever chemicals’ disaster
-
Letters to the Editor
Be well informed on new Alzheimer’s drug
Success. Please wait for the page to reload. If the page does not reload within 5 seconds, please refresh the page.
Enter your email and password to access comments.
Hi {SUB NAME}, to comment on stories you must . This profile is in addition to your subscription and website login.
Already have one? .
Invalid username/password.
Please check your email to confirm and complete your registration.
Only subscribers are eligible to post comments. Please subscribe or login to participate in the conversation. Here’s why.
Use the form below to reset your password. When you've submitted your account email, we will send an email with a reset code.