I would like to challenge the LePage administration and the Republican Party to publish, in black and white for all to see, the definition of an “able-bodied” person. What does it take to be not “able-bodied”? At least two limbs? What about four limbs but suffering from a severe sickness? What about perfectly healthy but a history of extreme child abuse, several suicide attempts and homicidal hallucinations?

Using ambiguous terms to win political points and push agendas is a well-worn strategy. They are smokescreens designed to dodge real issues. Yes, there are lazy people with no intention of working, but there are also many barriers to employment: low wages, transportation, mental illness, abuse, lack of good jobs.

And businesses do regularly discriminate based upon poor credit, physical appearance, age, weight, sex and race — though for liability reasons they would never admit it.

While any fraud is wrong, when is it rampant enough to add additional resources to fight it: 5 percent, 3 percent? All of LePage’s “victories” have revealed less than 1 percent.

Republicans should come out from behind their “able-bodied” smokescreen. Just what does make a person qualified and unqualified to work? Just how many of these so-called lazy leeches, who happen to have at least three limbs, have no mental health issues, are in good health, are not caretakers for someone else, have a dependable vehicle,and have been offered training for an above-poverty wage, really do exist?

They should give us a clear definition.

Brad SherwoodWaterville

Only subscribers are eligible to post comments. Please subscribe or login first for digital access. Here’s why.

Use the form below to reset your password. When you've submitted your account email, we will send an email with a reset code.