BOSTON — Lawyers for Boston Marathon bombing suspect Dzhokhar Tsarnaev who are seeking to have his trial moved out of Massachusetts again drew parallels Monday between the media coverage of their client’s case and the coverage received by Oklahoma City bomber Timothy McVeigh.

It would be impossible to select impartial jurors, defense attorneys wrote in a filing Monday, because “the crimes charged inflicted actual injury on the entire local population” and “greater Boston, was itself, a victim.”

Defense attorneys said “adverse pretrial publicity and leaks continue unabated,” and “media saturation can only be expected to intensify” as the January trial – and the April anniversary of the explosions – nears.

McVeigh’s 1997 trial was moved to Denver. He was ultimately put to death for the bombing, which killed 168 people and injured hundreds more.

Monday’s motion was in response to the prosecution’s opposition to the defense’s change-of-venue request. Prosecutors say impartial juries have been selected for previous high-profile trials.

The defense asked Judge George O’Toole Jr. to hold a hearing on their request. The U.S. attorney’s office did not return a call seeking comment.

Three people were killed and more than 260 injured when two bombs exploded at the Boston Marathon finish line on April 15, 2013. Tsarnaev has pleaded not guilty to 30 federal charges and could face the death penalty if convicted.

In a motion filed Monday, defense attorneys sought to distance their client from demonstrations outside the federal courthouse by people who claim to be supporters of Tsarnaev.

The motion asks the judge to direct U.S. marshals to take reasonable steps to rein in the demonstrators, arguing that their behavior could pose a “grave threat” to their client’s right to a fair trial.

Some of the demonstrators, according to the filing, espouse “outrageous conspiracy theories,” including claims that the government was responsible for bombing and that the deaths and injuries were faked as part of the plot. Any inference that Tsarnaev or his lawyers agree with such claims would be false, the court filing stated.