WASHINGTON — Maine’s House representatives joined the House in derailing a high-profile White House-backed trade bill on Friday, a humiliating defeat for President Barack Obama inflicted by Democratic Leader Nancy Pelosi and dozens of union-backed lawmakers from his own party.

The 302-126 vote left the legislation in perilous limbo, and came a few hours after Obama had journeyed to the Capitol to deliver a last-minute personal plea to fellow Democrats to give him power to negotiate global trade deals that Congress could approve or reject but not change.

“Slow down the fast track to get a better deal for the American people,” Pelosi, the California lawmaker, said in a speech that drew handshakes and hugs from Democrats that have labored for months to reject Obama’s request for “fast track” authority in trade talks.

“I don’t think you ever nail anything down around here. It’s always moving,” the president said as he departed — a prescient remark, given Pelosi’s dramatic announcement later on the House floor.

Republican leaders, who generally support Obama’s trade objectives, signaled they might try to revive the package as early as next week. But that could require the shifting of at least 90 votes within either or both parties, a heavy lift.

Maine’s House members, Chellie Pingree and Bruce Poliquin, were united in opposing the fast-track legislation.

Poliquin, a 2nd District Republican, had been mum on his stance until Friday, when he said in a Facebook post that his goal is “helping to protect and grow our 2nd District jobs by making sure our mills, factories and other employers are able to compete on a level playing field” across the globe.

“This proposed fast track legislation does not achieve that goal,” Poliquin said.

In a statement released later Friday, Poliquin went on to cite other local trade issues, saying he is battling “to stop unfair and unlawful Canadian subsidies flowing to competing paper mills on the other side of the border that are causing shutdowns and furloughs at Madison Paper,” in reference to a complaint against Port Hawkesbury Paper in Nova Scotia.

Poliquin also called attention to the New Balance shoe factories in Norridgewock, Norway and Skowhegan and the 900 workers employed at those factories.

“We need tougher and fairer trade agreements that help American businesses grow and protect Maine jobs, not those that kill paychecks,” Poliquin said in the statement.

He added: “The president touted the benefits of his fast track trade authority by speaking at a Nike plant in Oregon where most of those shoes are produced in Vietnam by workers earning about $1 per hour. It would have been more helpful had the president visited our New Balance factory in Maine and explained how his trade authority would benefit American workers making American shoes.”

Pingree, a 1st District Democrat, has long been opposed to such a deal.

“These trade deals need more transparency and debate, not less,” she said in a Thursday statement.

Friday’s setback was deep and personal for Obama, who had made a surprise, last-minute trip to the Capitol to ask House Democrats to back him.

Not only did they reject him by the dozens, they were led by Pelosi, who often has expressed deep admiration for the president. She joined in a tactic that even some Democrats called devious and cynical: voting against a favorite job-retraining program in order to imperil the trade package’s main component: “fast track” negotiating authority for Obama.

Hours earlier, Obama specifically had asked Democrats not to do that. But in a crowded House chamber, Pelosi urged her colleagues to ignore him.

“Slow down the fast track to get a better deal for the American people,” she said, drawing praise from labor unions, liberals and others who say free-trade deals send U.S. jobs abroad. Pelosi added possible new burdens to the legislative package, saying new highway funding and “environmental justice” should be linked to its passage if it’s revived.

In a statement, Obama said the job retraining program “would give roughly 100,000 American workers access to vital support each year,” and he urged the House to pass it as soon as possible and send the entire trade package for him to sign.

Other presidents have had fast track authority, which lets them propose trade agreements that Congress can ratify or reject but not amend. The administration now is trying to conclude negotiations with 11 Pacific-rim countries, including Japan and Canada. Other trade agreements could follow.

One possible route for pro-trade forces in Congress is to send revised legislation back to the Senate. But senators approved the larger package only narrowly last month after intense battles, and the White House desperately wants to avoid giving opponents there another chance to strangle the legislation.

White House spokesman Josh Earnest said Friday’s vote showed congressional support for fast track, and “our work is not done yet.” As for Democrats rejecting the retraining program, he said, the administration will contend “they have registered their objections to (fast track) and it didn’t work.” Earnest said the administration will urge Democrats to “support a policy that they have strongly supported in the past.”

Friday’s crucial vote came when 144 House Democrats joined 158 Republicans to reject extension of Trade Adjustment Assistance, or TAA. The program, which helps workers who lose their jobs to international trade, has long been a priority for Democrats and unions.

But the Senate had tied it to the broader fast track negotiating authority for the president, which House Democrats overwhelmingly oppose. Egged on by the AFL-CIO, Pelosi and others, the vast majority of House Democrats voted against the retraining program as a means to scuttle the entire package.

Moments later, the House did vote, 219-211, to endorse the fast track portion of the package, but that could go nowhere without the first part. Only 28 Democrats joined 191 Republicans in voting for it. Voting no were 54 Republicans and 157 Democrats.

Pro-trade forces now must either reverse the retraining program’s fate or send a revised fast track bill back to the Senate, and hope for the best. GOP aides said more Republicans might possibly hold their noses and vote for the training in order to save fast track, a mirror-image of the Democrats’ counter-intuitive strategy.

House GOP leaders suggested it’s up to Democrats to revive the trade package. “The president has some work yet to do with his party to complete this process,” said Rep. Paul Ryan, R-Wis., a leading author of the trade legislation. “This isn’t over yet.”

Yet minutes later, Ryan’s staff sent reporters lists of headlines highlighting Democrats’ rebuke of Obama, a strategy unlikely to improve hopes of a bipartisan recovery for the trade package.

AFL-CIO President Richard Trumka hailed Pelosi, saying, “She stood up against corporate interests and, as always, put first the people who are too often left out of trade agreement discussions.”

Obama drew applause when he walked into the morning meeting with Democrats, but sharp words after he left.

Rep. Peter DeFazio, D-Ore., was especially withering.

“He’s ignored Congress and disrespected Congress for years,” he told reporters, “and then comes to the caucus and lectures us for 40 minutes about his values and whether or not we’re being honest by using legislative tactics to try and stop something which we believe is a horrible mistake for the United States of America, and questions our integrity. It wasn’t the greatest strategy.”

Obama says U.S. products must reach more markets. He says unions and others should stop harping on perceived harm from the 1995 North America Free Trade Agreement, of NAFTA, which many critics accuse of shipping American jobs overseas.

Globalization, technological advances and other changes in the past 20 years, Obama says, make expanded trade essential.

Staff Writer Michael Shepherd contributed to this report.

Augusta and Waterville news

Get news and events from your towns in your inbox every Friday.


  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.