Yes, Hillary Clinton was way ahead in the Nevada caucuses for much of the last year. And, yes, her numbers among Latino voters in the state will furrow some brows at the Clinton headquarters in the next few days. And, yes, the broader race against Bernie Sanders is far from over.

But, Hillary Clinton badly needed to win the Nevada caucuses. And she won them. Period.

Clinton has now won two of the first three 2016 votes. Both of those wins came in caucuses, a format that, on its face, should have played into the passion gap between Sanders supporters and Clinton backers. She is now an almost-certain winner in South Carolina’s primary one week from today and will enter the big votes on March 1 and March 15 with the upper hand on Sanders. Sweep – or come close to sweeping – the states that vote in March and Clinton will have a close-to-insurmountable delegate edge.

It’s easy to nit-pick Clinton’s campaign – and I know many of her allies believe I do that on a daily basis. But, it’s important to remember that, at the end of the day, there is only winning and losing in these presidential races. If you think back to any presidential primary election, there’s (almost) always a moment – or moments – in which the outcome looks in doubt, in which the frontrunner falters.

We tend to forget those moments – George W. Bush losing New Hampshire by 19 points to John McCain in 2000, Barack Obama losing to Clinton in New Hampshire – in the broader sweep of history. Winners always looked like winners and we always knew they were going to win, we tell ourselves.

The reality is always a bit less glamorous – and makes us looks a little less smart. Grinding victories out state by state. Organizations that find a way to drive every last supporter to the polls. Candidates who get knocked down and find a way to get back up. Maybe two of three times.

I’ve come to realize that Clinton’s best traits as a candidate are her resilience and her perseverance. She will not give up. She will not stop working because she is tired. She will not back away. Ever.

Those traits were on display in Iowa and again today in Nevada. Sanders was the momentum candidate in each of those races. Clinton had the weight of expectations anchoring her down. And yet, in both instances, she found a way. Not by a lot. And maybe not exactly in the manner and style that some of her allies – or the broader Democratic party – will love.

But, she won when she needed to win. It doesn’t mean she will be the nominee. It doesn’t mean the race is over. What it does mean is that Clinton found a way when she needed to find a way. For that, she and her team deserve a huge amount of credit.

Only subscribers are eligible to post comments. Please subscribe or to participate in the conversation. Here’s why.

Use the form below to reset your password. When you've submitted your account email, we will send an email with a reset code.

filed under: