AUGUSTA – The Senate voted Monday against a bid to build a resort-style casino in southern Maine, dealing a potentially fatal blow to a proposal that lawmakers have considered since last year.

An effort to advance the proposal fell two votes short, 16-18. The Senate then voted to concur with the House of Representatives, which last week voted 83-61 to defeat the proposal. Taken together, the votes indicate the bill won’t make it through the Legislature this year. Gov. Paul LePage has spoken against the proposal, meaning a veto is likely even if proponents can muster the votes to get it to his desk.

Overriding a veto would require a two-thirds vote in the House and Senate. The proposal has been unable to gain momentum, largely because those who believe a casino in southern Maine is inevitable face strong opposition from the defenders of existing gambling operations in Oxford and Bangor.

The Senate vote did not generate debate.

As with previous gambling bills, the battle over building a casino that proponents said would be worth more than $500 million has not been partisan but regional and, in some instances, ideological. Lawmakers representing regions in or near Oxford and Bangor, the homes of the two operating casinos, have mostly opposed the proposal, while lawmakers in southern Maine have been mostly supportive.

The bill would establish a competitive bid process for the right to build a casino in Cumberland or York counties. The plan would be subject to approval by voters in either county. The proposal is similar to a bill that stalled last year but was changed to increase the license fee paid to the state from $25 million to $50 million.

The fee would be divided between the state’s general fund and a so-called mitigation fund if either of the two existing casinos closed within five years of the resort casino’s opening in southern Maine.

Revenues from the casino would be divided among veterans organizations, the harness racing industry, the state’s highway fund, gambling addiction prevention, off-track betting facilities, the host municipality, the town of Oxford, the city of Bangor, state education funding, and other programs and causes.

The long list of recipients reflects a desire to build support among various interests by granting them a slice of the revenue. In the past, interest groups left out or feeling shortchanged by such distributions have helped defeat casino proposals.

The bill, L.D. 1280, has been heavily lobbied since it was first introduced last year. Proponents included the construction company Cianbro, developer Ocean Properties and the harness racing industry. Those groups were countered by the established casinos in Oxford and Bangor.

Copy the Story Link