WASHINGTON — Housing and Urban Development Secretary Ben Carson has asked to cancel an order for an expensive dining set that prompted outrage this week after revelations that it cost the agency roughly $31,000, a spokesman said Thursday.

Reports of the purchase, which HUD officials said was made without Carson’s knowledge, followed allegations by a HUD employee that she was demoted after she refused to bankroll a costly remodeling of Carson’s office, which she said came at Carson’s wife’s request.

“At the request of the Secretary, the agency is working to rescind the order for the dining room set,” HUD spokesman Raffi Williams said Thursday.

Ben Carson: “As surprised as anyone to find out that a $31,000 dining set had been ordered.” Associated Press

The set was to be used in a room adjoining the secretary’s office.

Carson has not commented publicly on the matter. But his longtime friend and public relations consultant, Armstrong Williams, released a statement to CNN and said it was from Carson.

According to the statement, Carson said he was “as surprised as anyone to find out that a $31,000 dining set had been ordered.” He said he “made it known that I was not happy about the prices being charged and that my preference would be to find something more reasonable.”

Advertisement

In Carson’s statement, he said that his wife, Candy, asked if used furniture was an option.

The dining set controversy immediately followed reports of a whistleblower complaint filed by Helen Foster, HUD’s former chief administrative officer.

Foster alleged she was demoted after being repeatedly asked to “find money” to redecorate Carson’s office at Carson’s wife’s request, despite a $5,000 statutory maximum on such expenses.

Foster’s complaint was filed in November but not made public until news reports Tuesday.

Foster also alleged that agency leadership ignored a $10.8 million budget deficit that she discovered and recommended be reported to appropriations staff.

The agency said Tuesday that only blinds were purchased for Carson’s office and were within the $5,000 limit.

The agency said the dining set was considered “a building expense” rather than a decoration and was not ordered by Carson.

Copy the Story Link

Only subscribers are eligible to post comments. Please subscribe or login first for digital access. Here’s why.

Use the form below to reset your password. When you've submitted your account email, we will send an email with a reset code.