Supreme Court Justice Anthony Kennedy, 81, had an admirable record of centrism that made it hard to predict court decisions on major questions such as same-sex marriage and abortion rights.

Other justices’ decisions were largely predictable based on their known political leanings. Kennedy, nominated by President Ronald Reagan, seemed to relish unpredictability and emerged the swing vote that made same-sex marriage the law of the land in 2015.

His 1992 flip vote solidified the court’s affirmation of women’s right to choose on abortions. “At the heart of liberty is the right to define one’s own concept of existence, of the universe, and of the mystery of human life,” he stated.

Polls consistently indicate that the vast majority of Americans adhere to middling political tendencies, and the balance of the court should reflect that.

Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., called Kennedy’s retirement “the most important vacancy on the Supreme Court in at least a generation.” He appeared to recommend delaying Senate confirmation of Trump’s nominee until after the November elections, in which control of both houses of Congress is up for grabs.

In other words, he wants the same unfair process to occur now that occurred in 2016 when Republicans stalled confirmation of Barack Obama’s Supreme Court nominee and handed the appointment to Trump. The delay wasn’t fair then, and it wouldn’t be fair now.

The stakes are exceedingly high. Sen. Richard Blumenthal, D-Conn., labeled the retirement “Earth-shaking & gut-wrenching,” and called on Trump to appoint “an open-minded & fair jurist in Justice Kennedy’s mold.”

But the president, a former abortion-rights supporter, promised religious conservatives during the campaign that he would seek to overturn the landmark 1973 Roe v. Wade decision. It’s because of this specific issue that religious conservatives have consistently excused Trump’s other foibles and sins.

Now comes the test. Even before confirmation hearings begin on Trump’s nominee, we should expect hardline conservative state legislatures to start passing harsh anti-abortion laws — perhaps even an outright ban — in hopes of prompting a challenge that will wind up at the Supreme Court.

Editorial by the St. Louis Post-Dispatch

Visit the St. Louis Post-Dispatch at

Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.

Comments are not available on this story.

Augusta and Waterville news

Get news and events from your towns in your inbox every Friday.

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.