I received this from an anonymous “fake” source recently.
To: POTUS
From: SHS
Re: Next Press Briefing
Sir.
Consider using one of these statements to walk back your Helsinki remarks with Vlad:
• “I didn’t say, ‘I don’t see why it would be Russia,'” or
• “I said, ‘I don’t see why it wouldn’t be Russia,” or
• “I don’t see why I wouldn’t say Russia would not,” or
• “Why should I say why it wouldn’t be Russia or not?” or
• “I do see why it wouldn’t or couldn’t be Russia; why would I say that?”
This should confuse the hell out of the fake media; indeed, it confuses me.
BTW, throw in a reference to Hillary … Benghazi … or Boris or any other “Red” herring.
BTW, “red herring” is a common phrase and has nothing to do with Vlad or Russia.
So you are good to go!
Brian Kent
Litchfield
Send questions/comments to the editors.
-
Local & State‘I feel misled’: Mainers react to strictly age-based vaccine eligibility
-
Letters to the Editor
Hickman’s commitment is unparalleled
-
Letters to the Editor
Words to follow during Lenten season
-
Opinion
Today’s editorial cartoon
-
Letters to the Editor
Reality first for GOP, then unity
Success. Please wait for the page to reload. If the page does not reload within 5 seconds, please refresh the page.
Enter your email and password to access comments.
Hi {SUB NAME}, to comment on stories you must . This profile is in addition to your subscription and website login.
Already have one? .
Invalid username/password.
Please check your email to confirm and complete your registration.
Only subscribers are eligible to post comments. Please subscribe or login to participate in the conversation. Here’s why.
Use the form below to reset your password. When you've submitted your account email, we will send an email with a reset code.