We need to protect our elections, but there are two different issues here. One is the physical process of gathering, counting, safeguarding and recording votes. The other is the build-up to the election.
The first could be somewhat mitigated by dumping the expensive touch screen computer voting machines that do not provide a hard copy record for later checking or recounting, and which may baffle some voters.  I believe the most safe, efficient and cost-effective system is the one already in use in Augusta — the paper ballot.
The second issue is the run-up to the election. Fake or spun news on both social and broadcast media to confuse or dissuade voters is not only coming from foreign sources, but also from well-funded internal sources distorting facts, reputations and even voting dates and places.
Then there is the matter of voter-suppression campaigns and gerrymandered voting districts that look more like spiders than squares or rectangles.
And finally, dark money in elections has converted “one-person,one-vote” into “one-dollar,one-vote.” It’s got to be ended.
The loudest and best-funded voice is seldom the wisest or most honest voice when it comes to election advice.  The humane, rational, scientific or data-backed view is often the weakest voice.
And finally, in my mind, if we are to retain the Electoral College system, we should do away with the winner-takes-all tally system. If a few big states vote 51% (or less) for a candidate but give 100 percent of delegates at Electoral College time, they easily out-vote dozens of smaller states that could have voted 70% to 80% for a different candidate.
Harvey Versteeg

Only subscribers are eligible to post comments. Please subscribe or login first for digital access. Here’s why.

Use the form below to reset your password. When you've submitted your account email, we will send an email with a reset code.