A fire that destroyed a private residence and damaged the Peaks Island post office Monday afternoon has been ruled accidental, and blamed on improperly discarded smoking materials.
Officials from the Portland Fire Department, the state Fire Marshal’s Office and the federal Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms agency investigated the fire at 76 Island Ave., according to a news release issued Tuesday by Portland Fire Captain John Brennan.
A clerk was working in the post office when the fire broke out at about 1:42 p.m. Monday. There were two tenants in an attached apartment at the rear of the building. The three individuals evacuated the building safely, but a firefighter sustained a back injury.
Two on-duty island emergency responders and six Peaks Island volunteer firefighters were the first to arrive at the fire. They encountered heavy fire at the rear of the building, which contained the two-story family apartment. Firefighters from seven mainland-based fire companies were transported to Peaks Island by city fireboats.
“When we arrived on the island, the Peaks Island firefighters had the bulk of the fire knocked down,” Deputy Chief Kevin McGuire said.
While the apartment was destroyed, the post office was not burned, but did sustain significant smoke damage. All of the mail stored in the post office at the time was recovered undamaged. The seasonal occupants of the apartment have found other housing.
“The building did sustain substantial (smoke) damage,” Steve Doherty, the spokesman for the United States Postal Service, said in an email. “Street delivery will continue uninterrupted with the carriers dispatching from a different location. A mobile post office will be in place to handle retail operations as plans are finalized for a temporary alternative location.”
Doherty said the space used by the Postal Service was rented.
Comments are not available on this story. Read more about why we allow commenting on some stories and not on others.
We believe it's important to offer commenting on certain stories as a benefit to our readers. At its best, our comments sections can be a productive platform for readers to engage with our journalism, offer thoughts on coverage and issues, and drive conversation in a respectful, solutions-based way. It's a form of open discourse that can be useful to our community, public officials, journalists and others.
We do not enable comments on everything — exceptions include most crime stories, and coverage involving personal tragedy or sensitive issues that invite personal attacks instead of thoughtful discussion.
You can read more here about our commenting policy and terms of use. More information is also found on our FAQs.
Show less