I am one of the neighbors who signed the petition to the Waterville City Council about the Sacred Heart rezone (“Rezoning efforts of former Waterville church lead residents to file petition with city council,” July 6). I was not lied to, and the petition states that we would like the council to do their jobs and protect the neighborhood and protect the residents, not protect the developer at the expense of the neighborhood residents.
The petition asks for common-sense approaches to a significant development in a residential area. There was no need to “lie” to the neighbors who also signed. In fact, despite the dismissal of the petition by the council chairman and BACAS at the July 6 council meeting, several of the recommendations to the council it contained were recommended by the attorney the city hired for legal guidance!
I’d urge both BACAS and the council to put aside their preconceived notions of thinking that anyone who asks the process to be followed in a manner that protects residents automatically equals opposition to development. They might start with actually reading the petition.
Rien Finch
Waterville
Comments are not available on this story. Read more about why we allow commenting on some stories and not on others.
We believe it's important to offer commenting on certain stories as a benefit to our readers. At its best, our comments sections can be a productive platform for readers to engage with our journalism, offer thoughts on coverage and issues, and drive conversation in a respectful, solutions-based way. It's a form of open discourse that can be useful to our community, public officials, journalists and others.
We do not enable comments on everything — exceptions include most crime stories, and coverage involving personal tragedy or sensitive issues that invite personal attacks instead of thoughtful discussion.
You can read more here about our commenting policy and terms of use. More information is also found on our FAQs.
Show less