When I received a tax refund, the government was implicitly telling me that they made a mistake: “Too much money was withheld from your income, Thomas. Here is the rest of it back.” Yes, to return that money to me was “retroactive.” It involved reversing an earlier decision. But I am sure we would both agree that, retroactive or not, my tax refund was not an evil or nefarious plot to take away my rights.
Ballot Question 1 is indeed “retroactive.” It gives the Legislature (a superior body) the opportunity to alter an earlier mistake made by the agency (an inferior body) that issued Central Maine Power its permit. It is “retroactive” in a deeply American sense. It is “retroactive” like a tax refund.
It seems then that the only dangerous precedent at stake is the one being advanced by CMP’s multimillion-dollar advertisement campaign: a precedent that lumps the good retroactivity in with the bad.
Thomas Keith
Manchester
Copy the Story LinkSend questions/comments to the editors.
Success. Please wait for the page to reload. If the page does not reload within 5 seconds, please refresh the page.
Enter your email and password to access comments.
Hi, to comment on stories you must . This profile is in addition to your subscription and website login.
Already have a commenting profile? .
Invalid username/password.
Please check your email to confirm and complete your registration.
Only subscribers are eligible to post comments. Please subscribe or login first for digital access. Here’s why.
Use the form below to reset your password. When you've submitted your account email, we will send an email with a reset code.