It appears that those who prepared the referendum on the CMP corridor have tied this referendum to the legal laws of Maine having to do with retroactivity. This referendum should have been a straight up-and-down vote, not tied to anything else. It should have been an up-and-down vote on the corridor only.
The November referendum on the corridor needs to be without strings; without loopholes; without tricks; and without being forced to vote no in order to push the corridor project to be carried out.
The people do not want the corridor on the conditions that have been laid out. I don’t believe that the way the referendum was written was done correctly for the Maine people.
Essie Golden
Bingham
Send questions/comments to the editors.
Related Stories
Latest Articles
Success. Please wait for the page to reload. If the page does not reload within 5 seconds, please refresh the page.
Enter your email and password to access comments.
Hi, to comment on stories you must . This profile is in addition to your subscription and website login.
Already have a commenting profile? .
Invalid username/password.
Please check your email to confirm and complete your registration.
Only subscribers are eligible to post comments. Please subscribe or login first for digital access. Here’s why.
Use the form below to reset your password. When you've submitted your account email, we will send an email with a reset code.