The editorial pages of American newspapers have been publishing endorsements ahead of elections since colonial times.
While these pages, too, have carried scores of them since 1862, the editorial board has decided not to endorse any candidate in Maine’s upcoming races.
A conversation on the question this time around led us to ask: What is there to be gained by endorsing? We could not come up with answers that tipped the scale.
What is there to be gained by deciding not to endorse? Firstly, we don’t believe that our readers want us to tell them how to vote. By not endorsing this year, we’re creating more space for people to reach their own decisions.
By not publishing candidate endorsements, we’re also avoiding the risk of the hard line between the editorial board and the newsroom getting ignored, and our independence getting called into question by people who are either unaware of or will not bother with the critical distinction between the two.
And while we aren’t convinced that a single statement of our position on who should hold office should change anybody’s mind, we are of the firm belief that a varied and informative mix of opinion coverage can. Editorials based on candidates’ platforms, positions and promises are and will always be fair game.
As the institutional view can and does change, so can the institutional position. In recent times, our newspapers have chosen mostly to endorse. The last time we chose not to uphold the tradition was in 2014, writing:
“Some argue that an endorsement is a helpful piece of information for voters, whether they agree with the conclusion or not. But there are ways to convey information about someone seeking public office without creating that false impression that we are on that person’s team.”
The endorsement is a crystallization of the institutional view otherwise on display in a publication’s editorials (we publish several every week). It can be seen as a disclosure, an encouragement or a political intervention. Some look at it as a bet. The Economist calls an endorsement “a ballot in spirit.”
Although we will not be casting any such ballots for candidates, we will be offering our opinion on them, their campaigns, and the issues in them that are important to our readers.
We will continue to be brokers of opinion; a role we rely on our readers to help us fulfill. In addition to continuing to publish our own positions on the issues, we will continue to publish yours: your letters, Maine Compass submissions and online comments, in a bid to keep the conversation going and make it as lively and informed as possible.
Productive dialogue with readers is possible without candidate endorsements — it takes place here every day. We‘re not giving up on informing; in the absence of an instruction on who to vote for, we’re doubling down on it.
Send questions/comments to the editors.
Success. Please wait for the page to reload. If the page does not reload within 5 seconds, please refresh the page.
Enter your email and password to access comments.
Hi, to comment on stories you must . This profile is in addition to your subscription and website login.
Already have a commenting profile? .
Invalid username/password.
Please check your email to confirm and complete your registration.
Only subscribers are eligible to post comments. Please subscribe or login first for digital access. Here’s why.
Use the form below to reset your password. When you've submitted your account email, we will send an email with a reset code.