Question 6 begs the question why three sections of Article X of the Maine constitution have been omitted from the printed version since 1876. Some believe it was an effort to “clean up” the constitution. Others believe it was an effort to hide the states’ obligations to Wabanaki nations.
To me, the reason for the omission is irrelevant. If it was an effort to skirt our obligations, we now have an opportunity to stand by our values: we are inclusive, trustworthy, and we keep our promises, old and new.
If the omission was an effort to “clean up” obsolete section, we should now recognize the state’s obligations to Tribal Nations deserve equal standing with the rest of the constitution.
No matter what they believe about why these sections aren’t printed, I hope that my fellow Mainers will join me in voting “Yes” to restore these sections to print on Nov. 7.
Jeff Bates
Yarmouth
Send questions/comments to the editors.
Success. Please wait for the page to reload. If the page does not reload within 5 seconds, please refresh the page.
Enter your email and password to access comments.
Hi, to comment on stories you must . This profile is in addition to your subscription and website login.
Already have a commenting profile? .
Invalid username/password.
Please check your email to confirm and complete your registration.
Only subscribers are eligible to post comments. Please subscribe or login first for digital access. Here’s why.
Use the form below to reset your password. When you've submitted your account email, we will send an email with a reset code.