WATERVILLE — The City Council voted unanimously Tuesday night to reject the First Church of Waterville’s request to rezone its property on Park Street so the church can tear down two vacant buildings, expand its parking lot and build a ramp.
Instead, councilors recommend the church work with the city solicitor to reconstruct the contract zone the property is in to meet the needs of both the church and its neighbors.
Councilors must take two votes to finalize the decision and could take a second vote next month.
The church is asking the council to rezone 3, 5 and 7 Park St. from Contract Zoned District Commercial-A to Residential-D. But councilors said they want to protect the neighbors’ interests and suggested a restructured contract zone be developed that addresses parking, egress and buffers.
The church’s lawyer, James Monteleone, however, said not rezoning puts a substantial burden on the church.
“To impose new conditions feels arbitrary,” he said.
The Planning Board voted unanimously Oct. 23 against recommending the council rezone the property, with members saying they wanted to allow the church property’s current contract zone to be restructured. Such a change would reflect the needs of an abutting property owner who bought his home on neighboring Park Place after the church property was rezoned in 2020, they said.
Last year, church officials asked the City Council to rezone the parcels so the church could demolish two vacant apartment buildings and expand the parking lot. The city’s zoning ordinance prohibits parking lots in the current zone.
Church officials at the time said the congregation had grown substantially and that’s why they need more parking. But since then they have been touting the need to build a ramp — accessible to those with handicaps — at the back of the church. They said the church’s front ramp is difficult for some to get to and use. Building a rear ramp would require removal of buildings, they said.
Bobby Dombroski told planners Oct. 23 that he bought his abutting property in 2021 after the zone was changed. He said the neighborhood has character, and he and his wife did not buy their house with the expectation it would be next to a large parking lot. Adding more cars seems antithetical to the comprehensive plan, which aims to make the neighborhood more livable, Dombroski said.
Rafael Scheck, another neighbor, argued that the church must have known about the zoning restrictions when it bought the property.
The buildings include a duplex at 3 Park St. that is within 10 feet of the back wall of the church, and a former funeral home at 5 Park St. that formerly had three apartments. They had all been renovated, but are now vacant because the tenants were asked to leave and the apartments were gutted.
Monteleone contends the church is merely asking that the zone be reverted back to Residential-D so it has the same rights and requirements as neighboring properties. When it was rezoned in 2020, it was so someone could put a salon and spa business in 5 Park St., but that never happened, according to Monteleone.
Before the zone was changed in 2020 to allow Billy Dangler to build a salon and spa at the building at 5 Park St., neighbors went before the Planning Board and discussed the need to maintain the historic nature of the neighborhood and to have an adequate buffer between the parking lot and the homes on Park Place. They never got the promised buffer because the salon was never developed. If the property were to be reverted back to Residential-D, the church would not be required to develop a buffer.
City councilors and Planning Board members said they support the church’s desire to build a ramp, and want the church and neighbors to get most of what they seek.
Residents of nearby Park Place said at previous meetings that tearing down former apartment buildings and drawing more vehicles to the area would disrupt the historic and residential nature of the neighborhood. They also said it would eliminate housing when the city needs more places for people to live.
The City Council voted Dec. 5, 2023, to delay voting on the rezoning request until neighbors and church officials could meet to discuss the issue. Neighbors later said the church did not approach them to discuss a compromise.
Councilor Rien Finch, D-Ward 6, where the church is located, led Tuesday’s discussion, saying councilors want the church to be able to build its ramp, but the City Council has a duty to protect the neighborhood. He recommended the church present a plan for how it would deal with increased traffic and provide egress from Park Street and Park Place. He also recommended church officials work with City Solicitor William A. Lee III on a reconstructed contract zone.
Council Chairwoman Rebecca Green, D-Ward 4, urged a discussion, as the Planning Board recommended, so that both sides’ needs can be met.
“I don’t think anyone wants to drag this on any further,” she said.
Send questions/comments to the editors.
We invite you to add your comments. We encourage a thoughtful exchange of ideas and information on this website. By joining the conversation, you are agreeing to our commenting policy and terms of use. More information is found on our FAQs. You can modify your screen name here.
Comments are managed by our staff during regular business hours Monday through Friday as well as limited hours on Saturday and Sunday. Comments held for moderation outside of those hours may take longer to approve.
Join the Conversation
Please sign into your CentralMaine.com account to participate in conversations below. If you do not have an account, you can register or subscribe. Questions? Please see our FAQs.