1 min read

The passage of LD 1829 is both disappointing and dangerous. This law prohibits Maine municipalities from requiring fire sprinkler systems in certain Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs), undermining local efforts to protect residents from deadly fires.

Yes, we need more affordable housing. But affordability should never come at the cost of safety. Fire sprinklers are a proven, life-saving technology. According to the National Fire Protection Association, the death rate per 1,000 reported home fires is 81% lower in homes with sprinklers than in those without. Stripping cities of the right to require this basic protection is a reckless move.

ADUs are often occupied by older adults, people with disabilities and low-income residents — precisely the individuals who may have the least ability to escape a fire. By removing the ability of local officials to enforce safety standards, the state is putting vulnerable lives at risk.

Fire doesn’t care whether a home is affordable. It moves fast, burns hot and kills indiscriminately. Cities and towns should have the authority to protect their residents, not be forced to accept unnecessary risks in the name of expediency.

LD 1829 sends the wrong message. We can and must build housing that is both affordable and safe. Let’s not accept a future where one comes at the expense of the other.

Jason Grant
South Portland

Join the Conversation

Please sign into your CentralMaine.com account to participate in conversations below. If you do not have an account, you can register or subscribe. Questions? Please see our FAQs.