American taxpayers are paying tens of billions of dollars per year for a militarized immigration system. The fact is that immigration is a civil legal issue, but we are using the most expensive approach by using enforcement and hugely expensive detention methods. By stopping the building of more detention camps and private for-profit contracts, we can begin to create a new civil system for far less money.
While most people believe we should enforce serious violent crime, our current reach has become far broader. While a civil approach will take some years to phase in, we will end up saving billions over a decade. Below are reform suggestions that many people have contributed as solutions:
- Serious criminal investigations can be transferred to DOJ/FBI.
- Create a civil immigration compliance agency to hire more immigration lawyers, judges and case workers.
- Guarantee legal representation, which will dramatically decrease missed hearings.
- Stop expanding detention site; use them only by judicial order for public safety/flight risk, with strict time limits and required court review.
- Create regional processing centers to cut border surges.
- Use the Department of Labor for labor enforcement and expand legal work visas that serve real labor demand.
Our current system is expensive, redundant and hugely expensive. Employing a commonsense approach is fiscal discipline, not amnesty.
Elaine Shamos, MPH
Falmouth
Comments are not available on this story. Read more about why we allow commenting on some stories and not on others.
We believe it's important to offer commenting on certain stories as a benefit to our readers. At its best, our comments sections can be a productive platform for readers to engage with our journalism, offer thoughts on coverage and issues, and drive conversation in a respectful, solutions-based way. It's a form of open discourse that can be useful to our community, public officials, journalists and others.
We do not enable comments on everything — exceptions include most crime stories, and coverage involving personal tragedy or sensitive issues that invite personal attacks instead of thoughtful discussion.
You can read more here about our commenting policy and terms of use. More information is also found on our FAQs.
Show less