I appreciate the Gov. Janet Mills’ recent veto of the criminal records bill which would have closed access to almost all misdemeanor records.
If I am hiring someone to work in my retail store, I want to know if they have a shoplifting record, especially for multiple offenses. If I am hiring a nanny, I want to know whether the person watching my kids has a criminal record. Sure, many people have youthful indiscretions, but a blanket wipe-out of multiple misdemeanor charges does not serve the public. This is particularly the case when felony charges are often reduced misdemeanors in plea deals.
A more appropriate approach is to have an avenue for an individual assessment by a judge, with input from the victim and the prosecutor as to whether criminal records should be closed because they amount to a youthful indiscretion.
Blanket closure of criminal records serve the defendants but do not serve the needs of society or the victims.
Mary Ann Lynch
Cape Elizabeth
Comments are not available on this story. Read more about why we allow commenting on some stories and not on others.
We believe it's important to offer commenting on certain stories as a benefit to our readers. At its best, our comments sections can be a productive platform for readers to engage with our journalism, offer thoughts on coverage and issues, and drive conversation in a respectful, solutions-based way. It's a form of open discourse that can be useful to our community, public officials, journalists and others.
We do not enable comments on everything — exceptions include most crime stories, and coverage involving personal tragedy or sensitive issues that invite personal attacks instead of thoughtful discussion.
You can read more here about our commenting policy and terms of use. More information is also found on our FAQs.
Show less