The recent tragedy at a Portland group home should have every client-facing social services agency on high alert. Safety in these settings is often left to the workers. Staff are left to “make assessments” on clients’ mental stability. De-escalation training is great and almost always required in these settings, but is it enough? This is a systemic problem.
Maine has one person in charge of placing people into group homes. Why? These agencies are constantly trying to survive with budget cuts, budget changes, understaffing and burnout. We need support, safety measures, adequate resources for those experiencing mental illness, and resources for maintaining a safe work environment for employees.
In my own experience in a similar setting, an incredible amount of energy and focus is devoted to public appearance and minimizing ridicule from the community.
To prevent another tragedy from happening, it has to start at the federal level. We need funding and resources. At the state level, we need more oversight, clinicians and facilities. At the community level, we need support and acceptance. Senior management must focus on the facilities they oversee, not on the opinions of police, city officials, neighborhoods and folks who have a general distaste for people with mental illness.
Shalom House has been unsuccessful in past attempts to unionize. Imagine if it had been able to bargain heftier safety measures. We can’t let this death mean nothing. A vibrant young mother was ripped from her family and her community, and the system is at fault.
Sarah Geores
Portland
Comments are not available on this story. Read more about why we allow commenting on some stories and not on others.
We believe it's important to offer commenting on certain stories as a benefit to our readers. At its best, our comments sections can be a productive platform for readers to engage with our journalism, offer thoughts on coverage and issues, and drive conversation in a respectful, solutions-based way. It's a form of open discourse that can be useful to our community, public officials, journalists and others.
We do not enable comments on everything — exceptions include most crime stories, and coverage involving personal tragedy or sensitive issues that invite personal attacks instead of thoughtful discussion.
You can read more here about our commenting policy and terms of use. More information is also found on our FAQs.
Show less