On paper, Social Security is self-funded but under the “unified budget” law passed by the Democrat-controled Congress in the 1980s, the $2.8 trillion surplus referred to the Aug. 10 Kennebec Journal has been used to buy government bonds, in other words, to fund ongoing federal budget deficits. Thus, future Social Security payments in excess of collections will be funded by increasing the already excessive federal deficit.

On Monday, Aug.12, a truck turning on to Beech Hill Road from Route 2 used its engine brake, making an incredible racket. It was impossible to continue conversation.

Ironically, on the same day (Aug. 18) Editorial Page Editor Ben Bragdon claims that the newspaper wants to “bring all our readers in on the discussion,” you report having to remove “For Better or for Worse” from the Sunday comics in your effort to make the newspaper “even funnier.” Did you solicit opinions opinions from readers about this to determine which Sunday comics we value the most? Or did you take a page out of the playbook of Time Warner, which removed Showtime from its cable line-up without asking subscribers how we felt about it?

In the Rev. Jeremy Hiltz’s letter to newspaper (“Obamacare exemplifies the way of Satan,” Aug. 3), once again we see the Bible misrepresented to forward a political agenda. By way of rejecting Obamacare, the reverend tells us that Judas “wanted to force Mary to sell her private property to give to the poor,” when in fact all he does is ask if the money spent on an expensive ointment could not be better used to help poor people (John 12:1-8.) True, Jesus says the poor are always with us, but he does not say that means we should do nothing to alleviate poverty. Indeed, in Matthew 19:21-22, he tells a rich man to sell all he has and give the money to the poor, a command the reverend wrongly ascribes, as we’ve seen, to Judas. Jesus continues, “A rich man will hardly enter the kingdom of heaven.” The reverend also says, “Conscripted giving at the point of financial or criminal penalty” is not virtuous, and “Taking another person’s earned wealth by force and redistributing it hardly exemplifies the Christian way.” But in Acts 5:1-11, when a married couple hold back half of their wealth from St. Peter, they are instantly stricken dead. You can’t use much more force than that. The text continues, “And great fear came upon all the church and upon as many as heard these things.” So “taking another person’s earned wealth by force” was “the Christian way” right from the beginning. Being a good Christian means accepting all of the New Testament and not ignoring or altering select passages to support a special agenda.